Processed: [bts-link] source package iputils
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package iputils
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #498429 (http://bugs.debian.org/498429)
> # Bug title: ping to multicast yields DUP! replies
> # * https://github.com/iputils/iputils/issues/195
> # * remote status changed: open -> closed
> # * closed upstream
> tags 498429 + fixed-upstream
Bug #498429 [iputils-ping] ping to multicast yields DUP! replies
Bug #696310 [iputils-ping] don't worry about DUPs on broadcast ping
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 498429 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 498429 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #696310 (http://bugs.debian.org/696310)
> # Bug title: don't worry about DUPs on broadcast ping
> # * https://github.com/iputils/iputils/issues/195
> # * remote status changed: open -> closed
> # * closed upstream
> tags 696310 + fixed-upstream
Bug #696310 [iputils-ping] don't worry about DUPs on broadcast ping
Bug #498429 [iputils-ping] ping to multicast yields DUP! replies
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #696310 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #498429 to the same tags previously set
> usertags 696310 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 696310 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
498429: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498429
696310: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: