Processed: [bts-link] source package diffoscope
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package diffoscope
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #894334 (http://bugs.debian.org/894334)
> # Bug title: diffoscope: test fixtures have dramatically increased the size of the release tarball
> # * https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/13
> # * remote status changed: opened -> closed
> # * closed upstream
> tags 894334 + fixed-upstream
Bug #894334 [diffoscope] diffoscope: test fixtures have dramatically increased the size of the release tarball
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 894334 - status-opened
Usertags were: status-opened.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 894334 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #908991 (http://bugs.debian.org/908991)
> # Bug title: diffoscope: diffs hex dump of ASCII-armoured OpenPGP upstream signature files instead of plain text
> # * https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/7
> # * remote status changed: opened -> closed
> # * closed upstream
> tags 908991 + fixed-upstream
Bug #908991 [diffoscope] diffoscope: diffs hex dump of ASCII-armoured OpenPGP upstream signature files instead of plain text
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 908991 - status-opened
Usertags were: status-opened.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 908991 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
894334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894334
908991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: