[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[bts-link] source package kopete



#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kopete
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
#     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#

user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org

# remote status report for #503336 (http://bugs.debian.org/503336)
# Bug title: kopete: no "subscribe" option for jabber transports
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194249
#  * remote status changed: NEEDSINFO -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: WAITINGFORINFO -> WORKSFORME
#  * closed upstream
tags 503336 + fixed-upstream
usertags 503336 - status-NEEDSINFO resolution-WAITINGFORINFO
usertags 503336 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WORKSFORME

# remote status report for #530167 (http://bugs.debian.org/530167)
# Bug title: kopete ignoring toolbar changes
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193744
#  * remote status changed: NEEDSINFO -> UNCONFIRMED
#  * remote resolution changed: WAITINGFORINFO -> (?)
usertags 530167 - status-NEEDSINFO resolution-WAITINGFORINFO
usertags 530167 + status-UNCONFIRMED

# remote status report for #538688 (http://bugs.debian.org/538688)
# Bug title: improve metacontact ergonomy like pidgin
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201010
#  * remote status changed: NEEDSINFO -> UNCONFIRMED
#  * remote resolution changed: WAITINGFORINFO -> (?)
usertags 538688 - status-NEEDSINFO resolution-WAITINGFORINFO
usertags 538688 + status-UNCONFIRMED

# remote status report for #426293 (http://bugs.debian.org/426293)
# Bug title: kopete: ICQ: Renaming a group in kopete's contact list leads to deleted users in ICQ contact list
#  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146419
#  * remote status changed: NEEDSINFO -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: WAITINGFORINFO -> WORKSFORME
#  * closed upstream
tags 426293 + fixed-upstream
usertags 426293 - status-NEEDSINFO resolution-WAITINGFORINFO
usertags 426293 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WORKSFORME

thanks


Reply to: