On 31/10/14 12:29, Christoph Egger wrote: > I think I agree rushing in a kernel update might not be the best thing > and giving it full 10+ days of testing in unstable is a good idea The upstream changes were IMHO only very small and I'm deferring to their judgement that they were necessary and safe to include before release. It does also fix a minor security bug, hence urgency=medium On 31/10/14 12:40, Petr Salinger wrote: > Please do upload into unstable now, Yes, please do that anyway Christoph, when ever you can. I don't see any downside to it being in sid: I think the changes are careful enough to not get in the way of a future unblock, so isn't likely to force some future fix to go through t-p-u instead. Having it in sid allows users of sid and sid d-i to be already testing or having benefit of it already. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature