Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5595 - branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian
On 22:06, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 22:43, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> writes:
> > > However fuse4bsd ships a mount_fusefs binary and carrys a dependency
> > > on kldutils so it may not be totally useless.
> >
> > Though that could (and should?) be added to freebsd-utils.
>
> Aha, we could move the binary there and Provides:/Conflicts:
> fuse4bsd from there too. It might be useful to have it in a udeb
> someday.
For now, shall we keep the fuse4bsd source package, update it
for kfreebsd-10, and just stop building the fuse4bsd-dkms binary
package?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Reply to: