Hi! Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> writes: >> Btw: should we remove fuse4bsd from unstable? fuse is now part of the >> main kernel. > > Aha I was wondering about that; I'm not familiar with fuse, but seemed > to remember the package was going away. > > A lot of packages still depend on that (empty) package: > * avfs > * bindfs > * curlftpfs > * encfs > * exfat-fuse > * fuse-convmvfs > * fusedav > * gphotofs > * jmtpfs > * mythtvfs > * plptools > * python-fuse > * rofs > * s3ql > * sshfs > > so I think we must add a Provides: (and Conflicts:) fuse4bsd to > kfreebsd-image-*? We should perhaps wait 10 days for 10.1 to migrate. hmm are we going to have a kernel without its own fuse.ko in jessie? are we going to remove 9 completely? If not maybe fuse4bsd should only be changed to depend on either a 10 kernel or fuse4bsd-dkms (why is that a recommends btw?) Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
Attachment:
pgp_bgnCp489X.pgp
Description: PGP signature