Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] any news/reply regarding ZFS in NEW?

[Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@debian.org>]

On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> On 02/28/2014 05:37 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> > I advise against this. The upload is to experimental, is OK if the 
> > package has RC bugs.

> Why? If the maintainer has made some changes in the meantime while the
> package has been waiting in NEW and the FTP team hadn't yet the
> possibility to look at the package, why waste their time to review a
> package which is going to be redone anyway?

I am not an ftp-master but if I were one (and as a mentor for quite a
few projects) I would have preferred to have re-uploads because

- ftp masters already looked at some past version
- having old and new versions eases to see what has changed (debdiff)
  instead of starting all over or digging out previous version
- shows active interest of original maintainers

for original uploader benefit is that package doesn't loose its order in
the NEW (IIRC).

overall -- I am not sure what could be a benefit of REJECT+REUPLOAD

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik