Hi, On 09/27/2013 10:44 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 27.09.2013 22:05, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: >> Control: block 724678 by 724686 >> >> On 26/09/13 15:34, Markus Wanner wrote: >>> as correctly reported by Rebecca N. Palmer, flightgear no longer builds >>> on kfreebsd-* (due to systemd dependency). Please remove the kfreebsd >>> variants of the flightgear binary package from testing. >> >> I'm a little concerned by this: >> >> * that a package can 'Build-Depend' on systemd seems rather odd, > > It build-depends on libudev-dev, which is not quite the same. Thanks for this correction. >> * that the package's removal is requested, AFAIK without mentioning this >> to debian-bsd@, or Cc'ing us on a FTBFS bug for example so that someone >> might take a look at this. Sorry, it's the first time I'm filing an RM request. I tried to follow the guidelines here: https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals Does it make sense to extend that to mention the procedure requested above (for port specific RMs, that is)? >> But thankfully Pino Toscano contributed a patch that can fix this, by >> simply changing the Build-Depends, therefore I hope the removal is not >> needed now: http://bugs.debian.org/724686 > > Does the package also actually work on non-Linux ? No idea. I'd appreciate testing. What's the status of accelerated 3D graphics on freebsd-*? > What I'm concerned about is, that we are building software which isn't > actually runnable. > A good example is gnome-shell, which takes a lot of effort to keep > building on non-Linux but ttbomk is totally non-functional on e.g. > kfreebsd. Removing software for those architectures is imho more honest. Agreed. Regards Markus Wanner
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature