On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:57:33 +0200 (CEST) Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz> wrote: > Does it fail/panic using all available gcc versions ? > I suggest to start test with gcc-4.3 from squeeze. > Does it fail/panic with different optimisation levels (-O2 -O1 -O0 > -Os) ? See i.e. #594288. Thanks, I hadn't considered trying an older gcc than what's in wheezy. I'll give that a try next. > I expect, that some patches have to be updated for newer kfreebsd-10, > could you share them with us ? I've attached a tarball of all the patches I'm using at the moment (including test.diff which was attached by a more descriptive name to my previous mail), as well as a diff against the patches directory in the package now in experimental. A full debdiff would be a bit large since it would include a lot of upstream changes, which is why I didn't just do that. Some of the changes in this diff are just doing a 'quilt refresh' after fuzz or offsets in applying the patches, but others represent actual changes to the patch's behaviour to suit the new source. Note that debugger.diff is specific to my organisation, but cc_version.diff is needed for a successful build. It's listed as "Anchor-specific" in the series file because I was lazy with 'quilt add' and just added it after debugger.diff.
Attachment:
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn248992_patches.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Attachment:
patches_242489-248992.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature