[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#625985: net-snmp: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `kd'



Source: net-snmp
Version: 5.4.3~dfsg-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

Hi,

(-bsd + buildd maints in x-d-cc)

your package still FTBFS, but only on kfreebsd-* now. I can't replicate
this in an uptodate chroot on the kfreebsd-amd64 porterbox, so here's a
bug about it:
| libtool: compile:  gcc -I../include -I. -I../agent -I../agent/mibgroup -I../snmplib -g -O2 -DNETSNMP_USE_INLINE -Ukfreebsd -Dkfreebsd=kfreebsd -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.12/CORE -c snmpd.c -o snmpd.o >/dev/null 2>&1
| /bin/bash ../libtool  --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -DNETSNMP_USE_INLINE -Ukfreebsd -Dkfreebsd=kfreebsd  -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -I/usr/lib/perl/5.12/CORE   -o snmpd snmpd.lo  -L../snmplib/.libs -L../snmplib -L./.libs -L./helpers/.libs -L./helpers  libnetsnmpagent.la helpers/libnetsnmphelpers.la libnetsnmpmibs.la ../snmplib/libnetsnmp.la  -Wl,-E
| libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -DNETSNMP_USE_INLINE -Ukfreebsd -Dkfreebsd=kfreebsd -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.12/CORE -o .libs/snmpd .libs/snmpd.o -Wl,-E  -L../snmplib/.libs -L../snmplib -L./.libs -L./helpers/.libs -L./helpers ./.libs/libnetsnmpagent.so helpers/.libs/libnetsnmphelpers.so ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so ../snmplib/.libs/libnetsnmp.so
| ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `kd'
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=net-snmp

Mraw,
KiBi.



Reply to: