Hello, On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > >> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > >> > So best option for now seems be to prevent > > >> > freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of > > >> > kfreebsd-8. > > >> > > >> For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three days if not > > >> hindered. > > [...] > > > I have added the proposed patch for the cons25-debian terminfo entry to > > ncurses git¹. Once this is in unstable, the kFreeBSD people may choose > > to implement any of the suggested solutions. > > That's now happened; thanks. Is the ncurses change suitable for > migration in its own right, or does it need an associated change on the > kFreeBSD side still? Huh, looks like kfreebsd kernel change was reverted [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/E1Pa9a9-00028V-Gv@franck.debian.org -- Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.