Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/08/10 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > > > So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate
> > > > as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state?
> > >
> > > From the server point of view, I think we reached something close to
> > > other debian-ports, with even some added features like ZFS. On the other
> > > hand I have to agree that on the desktop point of view, there are still
> > > problems, which may break the expectations users have from a stable
> > > release. The desktop is usable though.
> >
> > With my DSA hat on I have to say that I'm not entirely happy with what
> > we have so far.
> >
> > The biggest pain for us currently is that puppet just does not work
> > reliably on kfreebsd (both i386 and amd64). This may be a ruby bug, but
> > it's still really, really annoying.
>
> Which version of ruby are you using? Is it >= 1.8.7.249-4 ?
Whatever is in testing, so ruby1.8 is at 1.8.7.299-1.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: