Re: Bootable USB images
- To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bootable USB images
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 02:30:20 +0100
- Message-id: <20100101013020.GA21541@thorin>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0912311445480.8418@herc.mirbsd.org>
- References: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0912162227391.15912@herc.mirbsd.org> <20091216235341.GB4963@doyle> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0912171253550.21089@herc.mirbsd.org> <5a6cd4690912170531q263ba724p4982788e3a968b26@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0912171343380.21089@herc.mirbsd.org> <20091221223728.GA22598@thorin> <20091230203911.GT5695@hall.aurel32.net> <20091231141237.GA24833@thorin> <20091231142006.GG11637@hall.aurel32.net> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0912311445480.8418@herc.mirbsd.org>
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:52:25PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Is there something you special-cased when handling CDs or not-CDs? (For
> example, grub-legacy doesn’t handle iso9660 from media with !2048by
> sectors at all.)
There is, but I don't think it has any relation to this problem. iso9660
filesystems in non-CD are known-stable code. Only the boot mechanism is new.
In fact, I have some ideas on what could be causing this, but unless I can
reproduce it, I'm wary of sending shots in the dark. And despite all my
efforts I've been unable to reproduce it:
- I grabbed Aurelien's mini.iso and extracted its files.
- I used the same version of grub-pc and grub-common as Aurelien
(1.98~20091229-1) to generate a new image.
- I did this on kfreebsd-i386 (I specifically installed the i386
flavour to test this).
I also tried today's Bazaar trunk and kfreebsd-amd64 before that. It _always_
works for me.
Except when I use the mini.iso directly, of course, but that's not very
useful...
Aurelien, could you try building the image in another environment? E.g.
kfreebsd-amd64 and/or using a newer grub-pc.
I'd also check if grub-mkfloppy works in your env, the boot codepath is
very similar.
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi
Reply to: