Re: strange SIGSEV

To: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@t-systems.cz>
Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: strange SIGSEV
From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:58:21 +0200
Message-id: <20060330145821.GB19686@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0603301554360.2067@mina.t-systems.cz>
References: <20060330115242.GA18562@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0603301554360.2067@mina.t-systems.cz>

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:05:46PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> 
> Well, next question would be why the second case passes
> even without prototype ...
> 
> The difference between 1st and 2nd testcase is location of buf.
> In the second case,  it is in main program,
> it is mapped bellow 2GB mark - i.e. 0x5009e0.
> In the first case, it is in shared library,
> it is mapped above 2GB mark - i.e. 0x2aaaaacc1ca0.

I see..

Well, I think it's fixed now.  New freebsd-utils for amd64 is in incoming.  It
is the first one built from proper sources on this arch.

-- 
Robert Millan

Reply to:

References:
- strange SIGSEV
  - From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Re: strange SIGSEV
  - From: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@t-systems.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: strange SIGSEV
Previous by thread: Re: strange SIGSEV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread