Re: Glibc-based Debian GNU/KNetBSD
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:55:39PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:56:30PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > It's about the GNU libc and userland, which are the standard in Debian and
> > I see no reason to replace them.
> For the record, probably 70% of the email that I've seen on this list
> falls somewhere under the category of a single, perpetual, floating
> To wit:
> GNU libc or native libc? (I've never seen another alternative, IIRC)
> GNU userland or native userland?
I agree with you. This discussion is just the nth iteration of the same
waste of time.
I'll go back to hacking now..
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)