Re: [d-i] Yet Another bug with pre-sprintf malloc:ing
> (Just recording what we said on IRC)
> So far -bsd haven't even properly decided on what libc to use. We
> need to have a lot more working Debian/*BSD before we think about
> writing an installer for *BSD.
> Still, keeping the portability at maximum would be good.
> (-bsd Cc-ed, so they can voice their opinions, if any.)
I don't know what needs to happen for any decision about Debian/*BSD to be
considered "proper", but the de facto status right now seems to be that it's
the BSD libc, since ports of the GNU libc are either experimental or
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/MU d->+ s++:+ a--- C++ ULISBH+++ P+++ L++(-) E-
W--(+) N+ o? K? w--- !O !M V?> PS+++ !PE Y+ PGP-
t+(-) 5 X R+>+++ tv-- b++>+ DI(+) D G e>+++ h r-- y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes