Re: Soooooooo...
I couldn't get gcc 3.0 to build. As for aims: this isn't exactly going to get
released with woody, or very likely with the next one. I'm going with anything
that I can get to work for right now.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:51:17AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Great. I'll prod this at some point over the weekend and try to get NetBSD
> > ones built. Have you done anything about differences between the FreeBSD
> > and Debian file layouts?
>
> I've built binutils packages, and have managed to get gcc to build but
> haven't packaged it as yet. Currently no versions of gcc will build on a
> netbsdelf system without patching, but patches are available. Should we
> aim for gcc 3.0 or stick with 2.95? (the patches are pretty much
> applicable to either, it's just a couple of mods to the configure scripts
> and some changes to the arch specific include files for the most part)
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: