[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?



Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2025-05-27):
> … and depending on your goals on the Lomiri side, maybe we could do the
> opposite of what I was suggesting earlier: propose something small from
> the installer, and let desktop users “upgrade” their systems by pulling
> task-lomiri-desktop afterwards if they so chose?

For now, I've decided to go with Lomiri = the real desktop.

> so if that's indeed a hard limitation (and we don't want to touch it),
> we might need to renumber things a little.
> 
>  - GNOME: 1
>  - Xfce: 2
>  - GNOME Flashback: 7
>  - KDE Plasma: 7
>  - Cinnamon: 8
>  - MATE: 8
>  - LXDE: 9
>  - LXQt: 9
> 
> A very quick search suggests supporting 10+ values has been left as a
> todo item:
> 
>     # XXX TODO: support correct sorting when
>     # Relevance is 10 or more (e.g. package
>     # education-tasks).
> 
> so in case that's confirmed to be problematic, moving everyone up (by
> how many units is left as an exercise to the reader) from 7-9 to make
> room at position 9 for both Lomiri and Phosh should work.

I've prepared a desktop-integration branch:
 - adjusting the description for the tablet one only:
     https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/commit/c45ed5a55553da4b8eaeade606ff6182844854cb
 - introducing a test stub to hide the tablet from within the
   installer (only):
     https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/commit/4f2f6c350701f9630e646afdae60a946645f7c74
 - making sure existing desktops stay in the same order while making
   room for new ones:
     https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/commit/eaa7aa4f174d5cda48f6ef951efff432d5b8841d
 - ensuring Lomiri and Phosh are at the bottom:
     https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/commit/a966e23d3e140bec3b607f8588a4fd385408599c
 - documenting what I did:
     https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/commit/e0a0bc36375281061956fce59c7d9a35764894f9

This seems to behave as I intended it, see attached screenshots during
(grayscaled) and after installation. (Note that I unmarked all tasks
that had been initially marked for installation, so the empty
selection in the second screenshot is entirely normal.)

Would that make sense for Lomiri people? Or would you prefer another
approach regarding the full vs. tablet Lomiri tasks?

> We still need to hear back from the RT in any case.

Still true.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: new-tasksel-during.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: new-tasksel-after.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: