[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?



Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes:

> [ cc += Guido Günther ]
>
> Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> (2025-05-26):
>> Combining this and the Phosh MR[1] ends up looking like this (1024x768):
>> 
>>   https://openqa.debian.net/tests/399843#step/choose_software/1
>> 
>> Lomiri currently appears twice, so that is 3 new entries with Phosh.
>> 
>> BTW The descriptions for the 2 Lomiri tasks need to be fixed, in order
>> to distinguish between the `desktop` and `tablet` variants, unless we
>> decided to only offer one of those via tasksel.
>
> Thanks. I think I'd like to have a single entry to start with, maybe the
> desktop variant?

Makes sense to me -- How well does using D-I on a tablet actually work
anyway? (There's not much point having the option if it's the case that
people generally prefer to create an image to flash, or some such)

> I haven't looked at either MRs at the moment, but I think I'd like to
> have the newest additions at the bottom of the desktop (kinda-sub)list,

That would have the (somewhat trivial) benefit of avoiding the need to
fiddle with the openQA tests for existing desktops.

They currently include the menu options as a list, and use that to work
out how often to press `down` to get to the option we want. Having to
have multiple versions of that table, and then try to work out which
ordering we're looking at this time, is going to be a little tiresome.

Of course, if there's a good reason to reorder the existing options,
then that will need to be done, but if not, let's not :-)

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: