[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

dose4udebs is back



[ bdrung and vorlon cc'd for information; DSA bcc'd for <3 ]

Hi,

dose4udebs was uncronned a while back, even if git doesn't show a specific
reason for it (lots of live changes hadn't been committed when bubulle
removed himself):
  https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/3d25abea44bb9122ee404394f6e84d67aa874b31

The last update happened: Mon Sep 3 01:52:02 UTC 2018. Until that point we
had access to a full Debian mirror on dillon (behind d-i.d.o), which meant
we could access all indices directly.

I requested a while back whether those indices could be made available
again to avoid having to maintain a partial sync myself (as the d-i user),
and DSA agreed to make it happen (thanks!).

This means /srv/mirrors/debian is still a broken symlink (to
/auto.dsa/debian) but we have access to /srv/mirrors/ftp.debian.org/ftp/
instead now.

This means dose4udebs is back:
  https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/44263866b787f349fe88710f550387dc1f6c3de4

and it seems to be quite needed nowadays…

Also, thanks to Samuel for the heads-up while filing #1064974 against
alsa-lib, the comment about other packages being possibly affected was
spot on.

Those following debian-boot@ might have noticed other bug reports:
 - #1066069 for libpng1.6 (udeb only)
 - #1066071 for mtdev (udeb only)
 - #1066073 for wireless-tools (udeb only, QA-maintained, fixed)
 - #1066074 for ntfs-3g (deb and udeb)


Graphs are available at the usual place, and I'm notified about changes
between runs:
  https://d-i.debian.org/dose/

That should help us stay on top of changes affecting udeb installability,
shortening the feedback loop for people doing the actual work of patching
many packages. (Some packages were uploaded 10+ days ago.)


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: