Am 21.04.2020 um 16:34 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > To be honest, I'm curious if there's a good reason to not just include > all the udeb rules files in the udev-udeb package? That would fix this I guess you meant udev rules files. > bug and save us from any potential future possible reshuffles. It's > not like they're very large. We'd probably have to check them, if e.g. they need special system groups, call external tools etc. The udev-udeb (and initramfs-tools integration) was mostly taken over as-is from the old udev package. So Marco might know more why the initramfs hook and udev-udeb use a more limited set of udev rules. > Happy to send a patch to modify debian/udev-udeb.install if that will > help. It would be lovely to also get the same fix backported to Buster > (and even Stretch!) if you're ok with that. This sounds indeed like something that should be fixed in stable. If the proposed change is confirmed to fix those mentioned issues: I do have an open pu request for buster (#956216). I could update that and with a bit of luck get that into 10.4. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature