[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#872094: marked as done (lilo-installer: fdisk dependency needed)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:48:27 +0000
with message-id <E1jKEFn-0007s5-5g@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#955507: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #872094,
regarding lilo-installer: fdisk dependency needed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872094: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: lilo-installer
Version: 1.53
Severity: important
User: util-linux@packages.debian.org
Usertags: fdisk-dependency

Hello,

As recently announced on debian-devel-announce[1] packages who need
any of sfdisk, cfdisk or fdisk will need to add a dependency on the
new fdisk package.

Your package lilo-installer showed up on codesearch.debian.net and a
very quick analysis suggested you might want to add a dependency
(and/or build-dependency if you use it at build-time, eg. tests).

Please use the backwards-compatible way of specifying the dependency
as suggested in the debian-devel-announce mail:

fdisk | util-linux (<< 2.29.2-3~)

(and if only for tests you might want to add the build profile
<!nocheck>)

Please reassign this bug report to the binary package shipping the
affected part of your source.

If your more detailed analysis shows this should be a recommends,
suggests or even no relationship at all to the fdisk package then
please just close this bug report stating the results of your
analysis (and if so sorry for bothering you).

Regards, Andreas Henriksson

[1]:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00005.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.62+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package lilo-installer has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/955507

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: