[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#921540: marked as done (busybox: New upstream release (1.30.0))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:41:43 +0100
with message-id <1553236567@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#921540: busybox: New upstream release (1.28.0)
has caused the Debian Bug report #921540,
regarding busybox: New upstream release (1.30.0)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
921540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.27.2-3
Severity: wishlist

busybox version 1.28.0 was released in August 2017 and we should
rebase on it.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages busybox depends on:
ii  libc6  2.28-5

busybox recommends no packages.

busybox suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Ben Hutchings wrote...

> busybox version 1.28.0 was released in August 2017 and we should
> rebase on it.

Yes, 1.30.1 has reached testing in the meantime.

Asking you for a favour, could you please revisit your patch
stop-overriding-stack-alignment-on-i386.patch I had to adjust. Does it
still do the right thing?

https://sources.debian.org/patches/busybox/1:1.30.1-2/stop-overriding-stack-alignment-on-i386.patch/

Regards,

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: