Bug#923585: marked as done (debian-installer-netboot-images: Built against openssl1.0 and ttf-freefontfrom stable (neither are in sid/testing atm.))
Your message dated Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:51:00 +0000
with message-id <fe062158-9e31-ea43-a545-0da1b3076530@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: debian-installer-netboot-images: Built against openssl1.0 and ttf-freefontfrom stable (neither are in sid/testing atm.)
has caused the Debian Bug report #923585,
regarding debian-installer-netboot-images: Built against openssl1.0 and ttf-freefontfrom stable (neither are in sid/testing atm.)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
923585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20190118
Severity: serious
Hi,
The "Built-Using" field of debian-installer-netboot-images references
openssl1.0/1.0.2q-1~deb9u1 and ttf-freefont/20100919-1, neither of
which are in unstable nor testing at the moment. The former was
removed very recently and the other was removed in 2018-06.
Thanks,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 14:44:05 +0100 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
> Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
> Version: 20190118
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> The "Built-Using" field of debian-installer-netboot-images references
> openssl1.0/1.0.2q-1~deb9u1 and ttf-freefont/20100919-1, neither of
> which are in unstable nor testing at the moment. The former was
> removed very recently and the other was removed in 2018-06.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
>
>
Apologies for the noise; I was looking at the -9 cruft packages and not
the new -10 packages.
Thanks,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: