[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#872867: is ISO-3166 really the optimal list for our users?



On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:31 -0600, Ben Hildred wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 13:13 -0600, Ben Hildred wrote:
> > > Lets Throw out this crazy idea for consideration: Drop support for all
> > > countries.
> > > 
> > > To start off this will not actually be completely possible because of
> > > broadcast regulations, but if you limit it to wireless networking (and
> > > other radio application) configuration, we can then define a country as a
> > > broadcast regulation scope.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > So far as I know, the installer doesn't configure the country for
> > wireless regulations.  This is fine so long as you use Managed mode, as
> > the wireless stack can just follow whatever the AP says.  (For other
> > modes, it might still be unnecessary as the wireless device normally
> > has a country code in NVRAM, besides which many countries share either
> > ETSI or FCC rules.)
> > 
> > This only makes it easier as there are fewer regulatory regions, although
> 
> there have been proposals to run-time configure regulatory compliance of
> wifi for travelers.

I'm not sure which proposals you're talking about.  So far as I can
see, that already works in Linux, and I maintain the packages that
support it...

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of
them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: