Control: tag -1 confirmed Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> (2015-03-08): > On 2015-02-09 22:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > >> Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> (2015-02-06): > >>> [...] > >> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see > >> get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this > >> kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check > >> anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and > >> dh 9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this > >> change slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on > >> this). > > > > So I've gone and done that (twice), the result of all debdiffs is exactl > > identical: > > > >> File lists identical (after any substitutions) > >> > >> No differences were encountered between the control files > > > > This show that the change (but also that the revert) is harmless. > > Frankly, I'd find the "explicit no-go therefore imposing a revert" quite > > silly in this specific case. > > > > [...] > > KiBi, if you (as d-i RM) are happy with that, I am willing to make the > exception - you are the one that gets to keep the pieces if it breaks. :) Sure, fair enough; let's do that, ta! Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature