Bug#757664: marked as done (partman-lvm: cope with automatic creation of partitions in loop labels)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:03:40 +0000
with message-id <E1XGYP6-0001Mj-3g@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#757664: fixed in partman-zfs 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #757664,
regarding partman-lvm: cope with automatic creation of partitions in loop labels
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
757664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libparted2-udeb
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: what subject says
[X-D-Cc: -boot@, please keep it in the loop.]
Hi,
3.2-1 had this alignment bug that prevented at least two scenarios in
guided mode (with a blank disc) from working properly:
- Full disc installation
- Full disc installation with LVM
3.2-2 fixes the non-LVM case, while it doesn't fix the second one, since
we're now getting a different issue, apparently about primary partition
count. I'll try to post more details soon.
I've rebuilt a netinst image with 3.1-4 and I can confirm that just
downgrading parted's udebs to this version makes d-i work again like it
did past week when I uploaded d-i in preparation for the D-I Jessie Beta
1 release.
Given this particular bug was also present in 3.2-1 (even if masked by
the alignment issue), I'm versioning it as found in 3.2-1, so that 3.2-2
has a chance to migrate when it's old enough. If that doesn't sound like
a good idea, please adjust version [and explain why ;)].
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: partman-zfs
Source-Version: 36
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-zfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 757664@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated partman-zfs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:43:47 +0100
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source
Version: 36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description:
partman-zfs - Add to partman support for ZFS (udeb)
Closes: 757664
Changes:
partman-zfs (36) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Cope with parted 3.2 automatically creating a partition when creating a
fresh loop label (closes: #757664).
Checksums-Sha1:
9a2d84eff9d7f96f69368f56cd4f7ddf68b010e4 1708 partman-zfs_36.dsc
4e253044650e30fc3458c7c868ce0a286e56bbd7 259228 partman-zfs_36.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
aac7ed0b872371fc84a898fff6618fe4f17f66d768124fc0840bba1f8ab78c59 1708 partman-zfs_36.dsc
19efc465928912c02121d814da3f9ef859d4903acaf66f06e572edf1f4386b6e 259228 partman-zfs_36.tar.xz
Files:
9b6f4ae35dc68c22f40b7b08ba906849 1708 debian-installer standard partman-zfs_36.dsc
3c6991dde158d069e518c96c641a9ded 259228 debian-installer standard partman-zfs_36.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer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=GDsC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: