Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

[John Hughes <john@calva.com>]

Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.3+deb7u2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

I built it in the directory containing the .git subdirectory

   * What was the outcome of this action?

make-kpkg decided to call the kernel xxxx-kirkwood+-xxxx instead of
xxx-kirkwood-xxx, so flash-kernel considers it's no good for my system.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

flash-kernel should accept an image called xxx-kirkwood+ as valid for
a kirkwood system


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)

Kernel: Linux 3.8.0-jh1-kirkwood
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages flash-kernel depends on:
ii  devio            1.2-1+b1
ii  initramfs-tools  0.109.1
ii  linux-base       3.5

flash-kernel recommends no packages.

Versions of packages flash-kernel suggests:
ii  u-boot-tools  2012.04.01-2

-- no debconf information