Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> (2014-01-22): > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:20:18AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> (2014-01-21): > > > In that case, to clarify further: I don't have any objection to > > > installing plymouth as long as the "splash" option is *not* included by > > > default. It's a minor waste of disk space if unused, but it might be > > > worth the convenience of being able to quickly turn on the splash. > > > > I don't see the point of installing something if it isn't used/useful by > > default. “apt-get install plymouth” should be fast enough for anyone who > > cares about having it installed. > > I don't see the point either, and I wasn't saying I was in *favor* of it > either. I just meant that the objections I was stating earlier in the > bug didn't apply if the splash screen wasn't actually *used*. :) I wasn't meaning to imply either of those. I was just trying to agree with you that installing plymouth doesn't look like something useful. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature