Re: 6.0.7 planning
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
> > updates; will that mean we need another update in p-u?
>
> Possibly; an alternative would be to release a 48squeeze1 via security
> to sync up w/ the fixes just before the point release. That would let
> us go ahead and get the lkdi/d-i updates ready and give us some
> flexibility to react to any follow-on changes that may appear this
> week as CVE-2013-0871 is discussed.
>From the release perspective, I obviously have a bias toward wanting to
get a finalised kernel and lkdi / d-i sorted sooner rather than later,
both so we can get people to test the former and to reduce the
likelihood of last minute issues / upload chasing with the latter.
> On the other hand, I know Ben has
> another fix queued for stable, and I saw a mention of a possible
> s390/KVM regression - so those may justify the extra p-u update.
Are these regressions from the current stable kernel?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: