Bug#699742: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release
On 02/07/2013 10:27 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
That means at least broken mini.iso, which is totally unacceptable.
broken without the patch i send for debian-installer, yes.
therefore, right now, even without any patches, the only actually
affected things are the images within the debian-installer-images
(wrong)
hm?
We're not going to patch various things to cope with syslinux 5 “just
because”. Especially when the list of said things is growing over
time.
i already commented on 'growing' and why that's wrong.
It's time to realize that we had working things, and that you broke
athem. Patching reverse dependencies isn't what is going to happen
here.
as elaborated, i disagree. to repeat, again, at minimum, it needs one
(confirming working[0]) patch (to d-i), and steve using the wheezy
local-copy of syslinux on the cdbuilder for debian-cd. not more, not less.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Reply to: