Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?
- To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:27:30 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1TqZak-0000Gu-DM@mail.einval.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130102202320.GK24625@mraw.org>
- References: <20121220142715.GA4380@mraw.org> <20121222172724.GG21706@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20121225222014.GR4281@mraw.org> <20121227065130.GB4966@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20121227152358.GI14624@mraw.org> <20121228060602.GI4966@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20121231075600.GA5419@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20121231110951.GI6406@type> <20121231110951.GI6406@type>
KiBi wrote:
>Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> (31/12/2012):
>> Thanks for the summary. I'll add one: brltty:
>>
>> - Kill Xorg instead of debconf to switch back installer from g-i to
>> textmode. Also, sleep instead of busy-waiting for Xorg. Closes: #696972.
>>
>> This is not needed for RC1, unless we make the graphical installer the
>> default.
>
>I'm planning to merge that one for rc1.
>
>Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to
>graphical installer by default?
None here, we could/should have done it a while back IMO.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could
ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs." -- Mike Andrews
Reply to: