On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote: > For most cases, I think not adding configuration for wireless in > /e/n/i is good, however for the kind a situations you described I > think the best solution would be to have the question asked, at least > with a low priority. If that would be the case, changing the > permissions of /e/n/i to 600 should also be considered. A low priority wouldn't really help, given that it would only be shown in expert mode. I'm not sure if there's a sane default here and would appreciate if others could chime in with their opinion. Things like "would we need to chmod 0600 /e/n/i?", "would all tools cope with /e/n/i being 0600 if so" and "should we write an entry that might prevent later installations of network connection management tools to work correctly?". Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature