[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#533797: marked as done ((busybox_1:1.13.3-1/avr32): FTBFS: util-linux/fdisk_osf.c:59 #error unknown architecture)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:15:54 +0300
with message-id <4D77EE0A.3000903@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#533797
has caused the Debian Bug report #533797,
regarding (busybox_1:1.13.3-1/avr32): FTBFS: util-linux/fdisk_osf.c:59 #error unknown architecture
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
533797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.13.3-1
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsmith@debian.org
Usertags: avr32

Hi,

Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to the avr32
definitions not being present in util-linux/fdisk_osf.c.

Please could these be added as in util-linux. Thanks.

The full build log is available:

  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=busybox&arch=avr32&ver=1:1.13.3-1&stamp=1245493983&file=log&as=raw

(The severity of this bug is wishlist purely because AVR32 is not yet an
official architecture, but otherwise this would of course be serious).

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith                                     brad@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsmith@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:1.17.1-8

09.08.2009 08:36, Daniel Moerner wrote:
> tags 533797 patch upstream
> forwarded 533797 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=555
> thanks

It's fixed in 0.15 actually, but tagging as 1.17.1 at least,
since this is what's in squeeze.

Thanks!

/mjt

--- End Message ---
Reply to: