Quoting Adam D. Barratt (email@example.com): > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Rick Thomas (firstname.lastname@example.org): > > > Package: installation-reports > > > Version: 2.44 > > > Severity: grave > > > Tags: d-i > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > That should be fixed once busybox providing sha256sum reaches testing. > > fwiw, that won't happen automagically, as busybox is on britney's "needs > approval from d-i RM" list. Otavio, what do you think of this? Testing is currently uninstallable because of the missing sha256sum binary in busybox. So, I doubt that allowing the new busybox to enter testing would harm more than the current situation.
Description: Digital signature