Re: busybox v. 1.18.3

[Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>]

15.02.2011 10:43, Michael Tokarev пишет:
> 15.02.2011 09:08, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Quoting Michael Tokarev (mjt@tls.msk.ru):
>>
>>> size on i386:
>>>      text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>>    403449    1790    8988  414227   65213 busybox-1.17.1
>>>    420316    1787    8984  431087   693ef busybox-1.18.3
>>
>> (cc'ing you, still...not sure if you're subscribed to -boot)
> 
> I subscribed to -boot back in November, in order
> to help with busybox and other stuff.  Setting
> Reply-To appropriately.
> 
>> Could you compare the size of the two udebs?
> 
> Sure.  For i386 arch:
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>  211893    1497    8684  222074   3637a busybox-1.17.1-9
>  221134    1494    8684  231312   38790 busybox-1.18.3-1

And  this is, in turn, not really accurate.

I compared newly built busybox with the binaries as found
in the debian squeeze archives.  But after rebuilding 1.17
locally I see that my version is different.

i386 udeb:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
 211893    1497    8684  222074   3637a busybox-1.17.1-9-squeeze
 221743    1497    8684  231924   389f4 busybox-1.17.1-9-mjt
 221134    1494    8684  231312   38790 busybox-1.18.3-1

i386 regular deb:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
 403449    1790    8988  414227   65213 busybox-1.17.1-9-squeeze
 418783    1790    8988  429561   68df9 busybox-1.17.1-9-mjt
 420316    1787    8984  431087   693ef busybox-1.18.3-1

I'll try to find why my environment produces so different
binaries (as compared to the build boxes).  Currently (at
least speaking of development environment - gcc, binutils
and around) I've standard squeeze i386 install.

> Note again - the config has not changed at all, all new
> applets are disabled.

/mjt