Bug#552700: marked as done (Add dfbinfo into libdirectfb-udeb)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:25:29 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 201002141925.30869.elendil@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#552700: Add dfbinfo into libdirectfb-udeb
has caused the Debian Bug report #552700,
regarding Add dfbinfo into libdirectfb-udeb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
552700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS Submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: installation-report: dfbinfo has changed location & no longer available
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:57:48 +0100
- Message-id: <200910280857.49262.elendil@planet.nl>
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.38
The utility dfbinfo used to be included in the libdirectfb udeb in
/usr/lib/libdirectfb-*/bin/.
In Lenny the utility has been split out into a separate package
libdirectfb-bin and moved to /usr/bin, and as a result of that is no
longer included in the udeb.
Possibly we should request dfbinfo to be included in the libdirectfb udeb
again. In that case its path needs to be updated in report-hw.
If we don't, it should probably just be removed from report-hw.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
reopen 552700
reassign 552700 rootskel-gtk
thanks
Thinking again I'm reopening this as, if we do want dfbinfo available for
save-logs, we could anna-install the -bin udeb. The most logical place to
do so would be from a script included in rootskel-gtk based on which
frontend is being used.
Still probably irrelevant if we switch to X.Org, but just so we don't
forget.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: