[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Review of console-setup wrt D-I [very long]



On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> The totally insane /usr/share/c-s-mini/c-s.config file
> ------------------------------------------------------
> The current solution seems to me to be a case of "we didn't know how to
> do it correctly, so we just took an easy way out". But maybe Samuel can
> explain the actual issues in some detail.

And if the current solution really is the only way to do this, then IMO 
the file should be at least be kept compressed at all times.

> Way too many obscure choices resulting only to confuse users
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IMO we should just only offer the generic models (plus arch-specific
> models). We can always mention in the dialog (and the manual) that a
> more detailed selection is possible post-installation.

BTW, it seems to me that for c-s to become a real success on the desktop 
users will need to be able to configure it using a configuration dialog 
that is integrated in their desktop environment, not through debconf.

If that is not done, users will simply continue to use the keyboard 
configuration tools that are included with the desktop environment, like 
the Settings/Regional & Accessibility/Keyboard Layout option in KDE.

Maybe something for a few Summer of Code projects.

> Questions are asked in such a way that they invite *wrong* answers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The main problem is that country names are used instead of adjectives.
> Compare:
>    * Do you use a Dutch or an English American keyboard layout?
>    * Is your keyboard from the Netherlands or the USA?
> Which is more likely to be answered correctly?

Another thing is that it is natural to think of a keyboard as Dutch, 
French, American, .... For American that means you will naturally look 
under "A" and not way down at the other end of the list under "U".


Reply to: