On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Well, I don't think there is any architecture which shouldn't be > supported, except s390 on which speakup doesn't even compile. As for > the images, I guess we can for now include it on the same images as > brltty, that would make things coherent (i.e. "accessible" images). > I have attached a documentation patch. I'm going to have to delay this discussion until I can see what the impact on image size would be. The patch to include the modules was incomplete and adding the missing bits causes build failures which means I currently cannot see that impact easily enough to make the effort. Otavio is looking into the issue. Cheers, FJP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.