[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#388159: marked as done (installation-reports: Please depend on lspci)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:26 -0700
with message-id <E1GVeZe-0000M0-QU@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#388159: fixed in installation-report 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: base

On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Frans Pop wrote:


On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:

On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:

Frans Pop a écrit :

The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and what is not.


Then who is?  Where should I send a bug report?


What is your rationale for including it?
lspci is hardly an essential tool (although it _is_ highly useful of
course, but so are a couple of 100 other tools that are not included)...
Correct place to file a bug report would be the pseudo package "base", but 
I strongly suggest you do not file a bug for this.


This has been discussed before.
Since the install-report template requests the output of lspci, I would think you -- of all folks -- would want it as part of the base system.
As things stand, it gets dragged in most of the time because the "Desktop" task needs it. But if I chose to do a minimal install without including the Desktop task (say for example because I just want to test a new part of the debian installer and I don't want to wait for the whole Desktop task to get installed) well, lspci isn't there.
Another use case for including pci-utils (the parent package of lspci) in the base-system is for a server install, where the Desktop task is not likely to be wanted, but the utilities in pci-utils are likely to be needed.
But, as you point out, "The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base system and what is not." So I'll just submit a bug report to "base" and let those who *are* responsible sort it out.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: installation-report
Source-Version: 2.19

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
installation-report, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

installation-report_2.19.dsc
  to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.19.dsc
installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
installation-report_2.19_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.19_all.deb
save-logs_2.19_all.udeb
  to pool/main/i/installation-report/save-logs_2.19_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 388159@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frans Pop <fjp@debian.org> (supplier of updated installation-report package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  6 Oct 2006 02:30:01 +0200
Source: installation-report
Binary: save-logs installation-report
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frans Pop <fjp@debian.org>
Description: 
 installation-report - system installation report
 save-logs  - save logs and configuration for debug purposes (udeb)
Closes: 388159
Changes: 
 installation-report (2.19) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * Remove the temporary init script added in 2.14; beta 2 is obsolete.
   * Add a recommends on lspci since it can be used for filing an installation
     report, but isn't required. Closes: #388159
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Bengali (bn.po) by Mahay Alam Khan (মাহ� �লম �ান)
   * Estonian (et.po) by Siim Põder
   * Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide
   * Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
   * Hindi (hi.po) by Nishant Sharma
   * Croatian (hr.po) by Josip Rodin
   * Latvian (lv.po) by Aigars Mahinovs
   * Northern Sami (se.po) by Børre Gaup
   * Swedish (sv.po) by Daniel Nylander
   * Vietnamese (vi.po) by Clytie Siddall
Files: 
 af38ac925d14e338de6cb6b2649de089 797 debian-installer optional installation-report_2.19.dsc
 e2a0cdd337a952c7cad97be6b1f3df35 68032 debian-installer optional installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
 5b25e1f7d8e4fa43fd4ed3d83404b02b 40926 debian-installer standard save-logs_2.19_all.udeb
 7b2dfc04091962db60f5f133ae23c7b7 13860 misc optional installation-report_2.19_all.deb
Package-Type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFJa85gm/Kwh6ICoQRAv4VAJ9BRWEosNi2rdM0S6KulZcQmeqMUQCfSvQS
7t1/ehyyyfAbCkmGVH5kMzc=
=tQLm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: