Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:41:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060616094129.GG22121@gpm.stappers.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200606161134.21364.elendil@planet.nl>
References: <[🔎] E1FoJQn-00030k-69@spohr.debian.org> <[🔎] 20060615215058.GA20249@gpm.stappers.nl> <[🔎] 20060616085635.GE22121@gpm.stappers.nl> <[🔎] 200606161134.21364.elendil@planet.nl>

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:34:20AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 10:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Why has amd64 1.23?
> 
> Upload was to testing, not unstable. Has to do with AMD64 archive move.

Aah, to testing.
Thanks for elaborating.

GSt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>
- Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>
- Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

Prev by Date: Bug#372734: closed by Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> (Re: Bug#372734: base-config: solution the problem)
Next by Date: Re: [MEETINGS] Cancel or reschedule meeting?
Previous by thread: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
Next by thread: Processing of rootskel_1.29_amd64.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread