Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
From: Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:50:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060615215058.GA20249@gpm.stappers.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1FoJQn-00030k-69@spohr.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] E1FoJQn-00030k-69@spohr.debian.org>

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:16:09AM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote:
> netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> along with the files:
>   netcfg_1.23_amd64.udeb
>   netcfg-static_1.23_amd64.udeb

I would expect  1.26

Why has amd64 1.23?



Cheers
Geert Stappers

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org>

References:
- Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
  - From: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: reassign 243082 to installation-reports
Next by Date: Bug#337316: marked as done (debian-installer: hd-install for powerpc fails to find the installation ISO image on an hfsplus partition)
Previous by thread: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
Next by thread: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread