[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#354147: marked as done (tasksel: Tasksel should pre-install alsa-utils package)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:48:03 -0300
with message-id <448595A3.2010907@debian.org>
and subject line tasksel: Tasksel should pre-install alsa-utils package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.40
Severity: wishlist

The alsa-utils should probably be installed by default with the Desktop Task: The main reason I find this is that it 
contains the alsactl program which stores alsa sound levels. Without this package installed, the sound is muted 
after a boot (quickly fixed by just installing it).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_PT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tasksel depends on:
ii  aptitude                      0.4.1-1    terminal-based apt frontend
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.4.70     Debian configuration management sy
ii  laptop-detect                 0.12.1     attempt to detect a laptop
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl        1.05-1     Using libc functions for internati

tasksel recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.41


alsa-utils package was already added (2.41) in the
desktop task.

Gustavo Franco - <stratus@debian.org>

--- End Message ---

Reply to: