Re: Patch to add DirectFB backend to current GTK+ sources
On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
> >> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be
> >> released with graphical frontend enabled by default ?
> >I am not sure, i got the impression that the default choice was not due to
> >this consideration, but more about the general maturity of it.
> I think that is not the case, iirc, the 2.8 was preffered for the
> exact reason of not having to maintain two gtk trees. Every arch
> except hurd has libgtk2.0-0 at 2.8.17 while 2.8.16 has migrated in
Sure, but this is a gtk/gnome choice, i was refering to the d-i choice here.
I thought that was the reasoning behind
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/05/msg00675.html, wasn't it?
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein