Re: Processed: Re: Bug#338191: d-i gtk installer on PowerPC, wrong colors displayed
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:59:38AM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >
> >>Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:32:56AM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>reassign 338191 cdebconf-gtk
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Bug#338191: d-i gtk installer on PowerPC, wrong colors displayed
> >>>>>Warning: Unknown package 'cdebconf-gtk'
> >>>>>Bug reassigned from package `install' to `cdebconf-gtk'.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Shouldn't this bug be assigned to the libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb or
> >>>>libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb since it's not a really a bug in the frontend ?
> >>>>In fact the frontend works fine on i386, only on PPC shows up such a
> >>>>bug...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Do we have tested it on other big endian arches ?
> >>>
> >>
> >>i know DFB & PPC endianess issues were being examinated lately at
> >>directfb-dev.
> >>To determitate if this problem is gtk-dfb related or not you could try
> >>to compile the attached gimage.c gtk app on your ppc and running it from
> >>inside the miniiso (you can use wget or scp to import the compiled
> >>gimage app)
> >
> >
> >Well, it exhibits the same behavior (cursor and debian logo), not sure what
> >that proves or not. Do you want me to do something else about this ?
>
> yes, you could compile the "image" dfb test app from
> http://www.directfb.org/downloads/Extras/DFBTutorials-0.5.0.tar.gz
> and test it on miniiso to see if colors are still messed up.
Ok, will do.
Well, i did the image example, and copied the dfblogo .png, but got moslty a
black screen and nothing else, i suppose this is not the expected behavior,
right ? should i try others ?
BTW, it tells me abotu a fusion_reactor_set_lock thingy, which is
unimplemented, but all the rest seems ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: