Bug#326723: marked as done (Davicom ethernet controller gets tulip instead of dmfe)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:32:20 -0700
with message-id <E1ELo1s-0008Kf-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#326723: fixed in discover1-data 1.2005.09.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:08:40 +0000
>From stefan.pauwels@stud.unibas.ch Mon Sep 05 04:08:40 2005
Return-path: <stefan.pauwels@stud.unibas.ch>
Received: from mail11.bluewin.ch [195.186.18.61]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECEq8-0001Fd-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:08:40 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (62.202.76.215) by mail11.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.063)
id 430D821C002275DE for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:08:07 +0000
Message-ID: <431C0B01.5050803@stud.unibas.ch>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:08:17 +0200
From: Stefan Pauwels <stefan.pauwels@stud.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Davicom ethernet controller gets tulip instead of dmfe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: discover1
Version: 1.7.13
Since the upgrade to 1.7.13 two days ago, my Davicom ethernet controller
gets the tulip driver. before that it always assigned the dmfe driver to
the controller.
the network is really buggy with tulip (a lot of "tulip_stop_rxtx()
failed" errors).
i always have to do:
ifdown eth0
rmmod tulip
rmmod dmfe
modprobe dmfe
ifup eth0
to make my network work right!
Stefan
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326723-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 20:40:30 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Sat Oct 01 13:40:30 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELo1s-0008Kf-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:32:20 -0700
From: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>
To: 326723-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326723: fixed in discover1-data 1.2005.09.25
Message-Id: <E1ELo1s-0008Kf-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:32:20 -0700
Delivered-To: 326723-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: discover1-data
Source-Version: 1.2005.09.25
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
discover1-data, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2005.09.25_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2005.09.25_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.dsc
discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.tar.gz
discover1-data_1.2005.09.25_all.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2005.09.25_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 326723@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> (supplier of updated discover1-data package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:02:24 +0200
Source: discover1-data
Binary: discover1-data discover1-data-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2005.09.25
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>
Description:
discover1-data - hardware lists for libdiscover1
discover1-data-udeb - hardware lists for libdiscover1 (short list) (udeb)
Closes: 281569 283769 323953 326723
Changes:
discover1-data (1.2005.09.25) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Gaudenz Steinlin ]
* change makefile to include all *.lst files
* add arch specific pci list for sparc, ia64 and hppa
* changed the following PCI IDs:
- 1282:9102 and 1282:9100 to use dmfe (closes: #326723)
- 1282:9102 to use tulip on sparc
- 1011:0019 to use tulip on ia64 (closes: #281569)
- 1011:0019 to use tulip on hppa (closes: #283769)
* Add entry for the following PCI IDs:
- 8086:2668 sound using snd-hda-intel (closes: #323953)
Files:
26c57f8d5ccec9ed426b1e232118ee5d 774 libs optional discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.dsc
7c0a242d1196a73d20a5ea83b8f6b038 124368 libs optional discover1-data_1.2005.09.25.tar.gz
102b5724db357a6bfb016f01d38db7d4 107024 libs optional discover1-data_1.2005.09.25_all.deb
adb002b1d40053d3a436d0c1660b2df3 17852 debian-installer extra discover1-data-udeb_1.2005.09.25_all.udeb
Package-Type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDPtzY8rUqXQpftocRAj+gAKDjGcj7ahTaWDLk89IPGDpqMw4iywCgzWgK
sxcfZDhxOMVQOf/EIVp2QfQ=
=mrYr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: