On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:18:07AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Hi all, > > Christian Perrier wrote: <snip/> > > This is not incompatable, actually: even if Josh answers with "OK, I > > come back to d-i development and will take care of netcfg", this > > package is important enough to have one, even two, backup > > maintainer(s). > > Seconded. Hello, I have seen the inventation for taking (co-)maintainership of netcfg. netcfg has my interrest. Also many other things have my interrest, but I should not take this job. At least not with my current todo list. Please bear with me Geert Stappers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature