On Jun 19, Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> wrote: > The amount of needed effort depends however whether the sarge installer > is stuck with the 2.6.8 kernel or not. Strict application of the > current stable release management rules mandate this, but there's a > general feeling among the team that using etch kernels for this would > help a lot. This may not be so easy, e.g. kernels >= 2.6.12 need a more recent version of udev than the one in sarge (and currently in sid too). > It becomes obvious that maintaining the 2.4 compatibility may become > harder and harder. This is however a key point if we want to keep the > etch installer able to install sarge. Why? sarge as is supports 2.6 kernels up to 2.6.11. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature