[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#234506: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] failed to find Xircom network card)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:24:40 -0400
with message-id <20050619182439.GA3101@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2004 09:44:38 +0000
>From mattias.waldau@abc.se Tue Feb 24 01:44:38 2004
Return-path: <mattias.waldau@abc.se>
Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AvZ7F-0000kl-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 01:44:38 -0800
Received: from abc.se ([213.113.221.68] [213.113.221.68])
          by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP
          id <20040224094402.KFQ11514.mxfep01.bredband.com@abc.se>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:44:02 +0100
Message-ID: <403B1CD1.70306@abc.se>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:43:45 +0100
From: Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package: installation-reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-02-23,

http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso

uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: 2004-02-23
Method: Booted from CD

Machine: Gateway Solo 5150 with PCMCIA Xircom, Realport Ethernet 
10/100+Modem 56.
Processor: PII 333 Mhz
Memory: 224
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
       table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

I had to select XIRCOM_CB, Woody recognized it without asking, Woody is 
installed on this machine. The network card is Xircom, Realport Ethernet 
10/100+Modem 56.

It didn't find the network card. After that the install wizard continued 
to the next step in the wizard, where it ask for the name of the computer.

Go back doesn't work in this step, so it seems that I am not allowed to 
change the selection of my network card.

I also tried to select the other Xircom choice that hadn't Tulip in it, 
but that failed too.

Why is the keyboard layout selection so random? It would be nice if it 
were alphabetically, I am from Sweden.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234506-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2005 19:46:17 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Jun 19 12:46:17 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dk5kH-0004Pu-00; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:46:17 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DD817DF2;
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F12E76E57F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:24:40 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 234506-done@bugs.debian.org, 295864-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing old bugs
Message-ID: <20050619182439.GA3101@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 234506-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm closing these bug reports because we've been waiting on info from
the bug submitters for a long time, and done a lot of work since than
that is likely to have fixed them.

--=20
see shy jo

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCtbhnd8HHehbQuO8RAuLOAJ9WnkhKPW8jqTA0d8kR+QM8zwIp7QCdEhq1
vd4FMGWbyB/9Y89eWDFCyYc=
=i6jL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--



Reply to: