[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#293449: marked as done (Bug partman)



Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:31:14 +0100
with message-id <200502031831.15365.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#293449: Bug partman
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2005 14:16:12 +0000
>From stefan@endo7.com Thu Feb 03 06:16:12 2005
Return-path: <stefan@endo7.com>
Received: from mail.endo7.com [213.21.136.14] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CwhmF-0002wB-00; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:16:12 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.endo7.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8114D23644
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu,  3 Feb 2005 15:15:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.endo7.com (Postfix, from userid 1022)
	id DE76523658; Thu,  3 Feb 2005 15:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.0.41] (unknown [10.0.0.41])
	by mail.endo7.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C10623644
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu,  3 Feb 2005 15:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <42023213.8080202@endo7.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 15:15:47 +0100
From: Stefan Haberl <stefan@endo7.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug partman
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.499918, version=0.11.2
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 01.02.2005 from 
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/
uname -a: Linux can 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Mon Jan 24 03:01:58 EST 2005 i686 unknown
Date: 03.02.2005
Method: Cdrom Install

Machine: HP Proliant350ML G4
Processor: Dual Xeon 3MHz
Memory: 2GB
Root Device:  SCSI  /dev/cciss/c0d0
Root Size/partition table: not available
Output of lspci and lspci -n: not available

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O ]
Configure network HW:   [O ]
Config network:         [ O]
Detect CD:              [ O]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives:     [E ]
Partition hard drives:  [E ]
Create file systems:    [E ]
Mount partitions:       [E ]
Install base system:    [E ]
Install boot loader:    [E ]
Reboot:                 [E ]

Comments/Problems:
The Module cciss loading successfully but Partman is not able to detect 
the Harddrive. If i choose "back" the installer hangs completely.

Last lines in messages:
File descriptor 3 left open
File descriptor 4 left open
File descriptor 5 left open
File descriptor 6 left open
No matching physical volumes found
File descriptor 3 left open
File descriptor 4 left open
File descriptor 5 left open
File descriptor 6 left open
No volume groups found

Last lines in syslog:
DEBUG: Menu item 'partman' selected
DEBUG: configure partman, status: 2
DEBUG: configure libc6, status: 0
DEBUG: vrtualpackage libc6
DEBUG: configure libparted1.6-0, status: 0
DEBUG: configure harddrive-detection, status: 0


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293449-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2005 17:31:50 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Thu Feb 03 09:31:50 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl (ha-smtp3.tiscali.nl) [195.241.80.19] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cwkpa-0005RK-00; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:31:50 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [195.240.184.66])
	by ha-smtp3.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1798845A5B8;
	Thu,  3 Feb 2005 18:31:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 293449-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#293449: Bug partman
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:31:14 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
Cc: Stefan Haberl <stefan@endo7.com>
References: <42023213.8080202@endo7.com> <20050203163032.GC20868@logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20050203163032.GC20868@logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502031831.15365.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 293449-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thursday 03 February 2005 17:30, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:15:47PM +0100, Stefan Haberl wrote:
> > The Module cciss loading successfully but Partman is not able to
> > detect the Harddrive. If i choose "back" the installer hangs
> > completely.
>
> Can you send us the files from /var/log? We need them in order to see
> what happened.  Try to copy them to a floppy disk, to a mounted
> existing partition or to a USB flash memory.

This is almost certainly caused by the change last weekend of libparted to 
a new version. The programs using libparted have to be updated to use 
this new version.
This is being worked on and should be fixed in a few days.

Closing your report because of this.

Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: